Reading Time: 7 minutes

Hey Prompt Lover,

Welcome back.

The series has been running for four days and the inbox has been full every morning. Before we get into today's question I want to mention something that came in over the weekend that I haven't been able to shake.

Someone replied to the weekend email with three words.

"I don't have data and money."

That was it. No name. No explanation needed.

They have been reading this newsletter about AI tools, skills packs, prompting techniques, and capability gaps. And what they wanted to say was simple. This conversation assumes access. It assumes subscriptions, devices, reliable internet, the freedom to spend time experimenting with tools that cost money.

Not everyone has that.

I am not going to solve that problem in a newsletter. But I am not going to pretend that person's reply didn't land either. Because one of the uncomfortable questions this series hasn't asked yet is who the AI revolution is actually happening for and who is watching it from the outside.

We will get to that one. It is on the calendar.

Today's question is different. Today we go somewhere more personal.

ChatGPT is a superpower if you know how to use it correctly.

Discover how HubSpot's guide to AI can elevate both your productivity and creativity to get more things done.

Learn to automate tasks, enhance decision-making, and foster innovation with the power of AI.

Download the free guide

Would you know if your best idea this year came from AI?

Think back through the last twelve months. The idea that landed. The angle that worked. The piece of content that performed. The business decision that turned out right. The solution you found to a problem you had been stuck on.

Now think about how many of those started with a conversation in Claude or ChatGPT.

Not the execution. The idea itself.

Here is what I mean.

Most people think of AI as a tool for doing things. Writing. Summarising. Coding. Generating. But a quieter and more significant shift is happening in how people use AI to think. They open a chat not to produce something but to talk through something. To explore an idea. To ask what angles exist on a problem. To hear what someone or something else thinks before they decide what they think.

And in those conversations, ideas form.

The question is: where did they come from?

When you brainstorm with Claude, a specific thing happens.

You bring a seed. Claude expands it into ten directions. Some of those directions you already knew. Some of them you find obvious once you see them. And some of them maybe one or two are genuinely things you would not have arrived at on your own in that session.

You take one of those and run with it. You develop it. You pour your knowledge and experience into it. You make it real.

By the time it becomes something, it feels completely yours. Because the work of making it real was entirely yours. But the spark that set it in motion came from a machine.

Is that your idea?

That investor was wrong. Gamma is now worth $2B, with 50M users and more than half their growth driven by word of mouth.

They're one of 6 AI-native startups in HubSpot for Startups' free Bold Bets Playbook. Replit grew revenue 50x after half the team pushed back on the strategy. Ramp generated 100M+ views from a single stunt. Clay's co-founder wouldn't hang up a sales call until the prospect DMed him in Slack.

Each one took a GTM risk most founders would never greenlight. Each one paid off.

Get the free Bold Bets playbook

Most people would say yes immediately. The idea is mine. Claude just helped me see it. The work was mine. The judgment about which direction to pursue was mine. The execution was mine.

And I think they're mostly right.

But here is the version of this question that makes it harder.

What if Claude's suggestion was not just one direction you chose from many. What if it was the thing that reframed your entire approach. The thing that made you see a problem you had been working on completely differently. The thing that became your signature insight for the year.

What if your best professional thinking of 2025 or 2026 was seeded by a model that has no memory of the conversation and no stake in what you do with it.

Does that change anything?

This question is not about credit. It is about the relationship between thinking and identity.

We are what we think. Our ideas are how we show up in the world professionally and personally. The quality of our ideas is, in most fields, the quality of our contribution. When we develop a reputation for clear thinking, sharp angles, original perspective — that reputation is built on the visible outputs of an invisible process.

AI is now inside that invisible process for millions of people.

And the question I keep coming back to is whether that is expanding human thinking or outsourcing the part of it that we thought was most uniquely ours.

Jeff Pogue, who has been one of the most generous contributors to this series, asked exactly the right version of this two days ago when he flipped the capability question.

Did AI give you capabilities you never had? Or did it replace the process by which you would have developed those capabilities naturally?

For execution tasks the answer is usually the first one. AI made you faster at things you already knew how to do.

For thinking and ideation, the answer is less clear. And the discomfort of not being sure is exactly where today's question lives.

The newsletter series you are reading right now started as a conversation with Claude.

Not the content. The structure. The idea of thirty questions over thirty days came out of a session where I was trying to figure out what to write that felt genuinely different. Claude offered the format among several options. I chose it. I wrote every question. I wrote every issue. The thinking has been mine.

But would I have arrived at this format without that session? I genuinely do not know.

And I think not knowing is the honest answer that most people who use AI seriously should be sitting with.

Ryan replied to the Saturday email and asked if we would consider speaking at a gathering he is putting together for brands and businesses.

That is not a question for a newsletter. But I mention it because it is a reminder that this community is real and it is building things and it is showing up in ways that go beyond the inbox.

If you have something you want to bring to this community an opportunity, a question, a reply that didn't fit in a sentence the email is always open.

Ask Attio anything: prep for calls, update records, spot deals at risk Over 4,000 startups including Granola, Wispr Flow, and Lightdash, already use Attio. Try Attio for free.

Today's question for the inbox.

Think of the idea you are most proud of from the last year. The one that defined your best work. Walk yourself back through where it started.

Was there a Claude session early in that process? Was there a prompt that opened a direction you hadn't seen?

You don't have to share the idea. Just tell me honestly whether you know where it came from.

Reply and I will read every one.

Day 6 arrives tomorrow.

— Prompt Guy

Day 5 of 30. One question every day that the AI industry is not asking. Forward this to someone who should be in this conversation.